In addition to the firm’s Supreme Court practice, Boyden Gray & Associates has an active appellate litigation practice in federal and state appellate courts. The firm’s lawyers clerked for judges on the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fifth, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuits, and the United States Supreme Court. The firm has represented states, corporations, non-profits, and individuals as parties on appeal in matters involving constitutional rights, environmental law, automotive rules, telecommunications, and financial regulation.
- Opening Brief in Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment, et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 21-60626 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Nov. 22, 2021)
- Boyden Gray & Associates Files Petition for Review of OSHA ETS Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate on Behalf of Job Creators Network, et al.
- Brief of Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees, Maxon v. Fuller Theological Seminary, Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (June 21, 2021)
- Petitioners’ Reply Brief in Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, Agency Nos. 44-14, 45-14 (Or. App. Sept. 8, 2016)
- Petition for Rehearing En Banc for Intervenors TechFreedom et al., U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. FCC, No. 15-1063 (D.C. Cir. July 29, 2016)
- Petitioners’ Opening Brief in Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, Agency Nos. 44-14, 45-14 (Or. App. Apr. 25, 2016)
- Reply Brief for the Petitioners for the Petitioners, Kansas v. EPA, No. 14-1268 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 28, 2015)
- Brief for the Petitioners, Kansas v. EPA, No. 14-1268 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 28, 2015)
- Reply Brief for Intervenors TechFreedom et al., U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. FCC, No. 15-1063 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 13, 2015)
- Brief for Intervenors TechFreedom et al., U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. FCC, No. 15-1063 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 13, 2015)
- Reply Brief for the Petitioners, Energy Future Coalition v. EPA, No. 14-1123 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 12, 2015)
- Brief for the Petitioners, Energy Future Coalition v. EPA, No. 14-1123 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 12, 2015)
- Opening Brief for the State Appellants, State National Bank of Big Spring v. Lew, Nos. 13-5247, 13-5248 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 11, 2014)
- Opening Brief of Private Plaintiffs-Appellants, State National Bank of Big Spring v. Lew, Nos. 13-5247, 13-5248 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 11, 2014)
The firm has also represented scholars, medical professionals, and public policy organizations as amici curiae in high-profile appellate litigation concerning healthcare regulation, election law, the separation of powers, and judicial deference to federal agencies.
- Brief of Amicus Curiae Kevin Donovan, M.D., Planned Parenthood v. Smith, No. 17-50282 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2017)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae State National Bank of Big Spring et al., PHH Corp. v. CFPB, No. 15-1177 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 10, 2017)
- Brief of American Action Forum as Amicus Curiae in Support of Rehearing En Banc, Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, No. 14-1806 (7th Cir. Sept. 8, 2015)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae The Galen Institute, Halbig v. Burwell, No. 14-5018 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 3, 2014) (en banc)
- Brief of Former Members of the FEC, O’Keefe v. Chisholm, No. 14-1822 (7th Cir. Sept. 2, 2014)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae The Galen Institute, King v. Sebelius, No. 14-1158 (4th Cir. Feb. 6, 2014)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae The Galen Institute, Halbig v. Sebelius, No. 14-5018 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 6, 2014)
- Brief of Bioethics Scholars as Amici Curiae, Sherley v. Sebelius, No. 11-5241 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 27, 2012)